Physiotherapy - Reviews
Early Access
Efficacy of positive expiratory pressure in the prevention and treatment of postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracic and abdominal surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 4 February 2026
183
Views
107
Downloads
Authors
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including atelectasis, pneumonia, and respiratory failure, are common after thoracic and upper abdominal surgery and are associated with increased morbidity, longer hospital stays, and higher costs. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated whether positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices reduce PPCs after thoracic or upper abdominal surgery compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), usual care/no intervention, or other non-CPAP respiratory treatments. We searched major databases and included randomized controlled trials. A total of 12 studies were included, and 7 contributed to the meta-analysis. Across comparator-stratified analyses, PEP did not demonstrate a consistent reduction in PPCs. Compared with usual care/no intervention, pooled estimates showed no significant benefit, and results were similarly inconclusive when PEP was compared with other non-CPAP treatments; evidence versus CPAP was limited to a single small trial. The overall certainty of evidence was low due to methodological limitations and heterogeneity in outcome definitions and intervention protocols. Overall, current evidence does not support routine use of PEP devices as a primary strategy to prevent PPCs after thoracic or upper abdominal surgery. Further well-designed trials are needed to clarify whether specific patient subgroups or standardized protocols may benefit.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
Warner DO. Preventing postoperative pulmonary complications: the role of the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1467-72.
Agostini P, Cieslik H, Rathinam S, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracic surgery: are there any modifiable risk factors? Thorax 2010;65:815-8.
Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, et al. Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2014;2:1007-15.
Lusquinhos J, Tavares M, Abelha F. Postoperative pulmonary complications and perioperative strategies: a systematic review. Cureus. 2023;15:e38786.
LAS VEGAS investigators. Epidemiology, practice of ventilation and outcome for patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: LAS VEGAS – an observational study in 29 countries. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017;34:492-507.
Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology 2010;113:1338-50.
Orman J, Westerdahl E. Chest physiotherapy with positive expiratory pressure breathing after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010;54:261-7.
McIlwaine M, Button B, Nevitt SJ. Positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;11:CD003147.
Andrews J, Sathe NA, Krishnaswami S, et al. Nonpharmacologic airway clearance techniques in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. Respir Care 2013;58:2160-86.
Christensen EF, Schultz P, Jensen OV, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications and lung function in high-risk patients: a comparison of three physiotherapy regimens after upper abdominal surgery in general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991;35:97-104.
Pieczkoski SM, de Oliveira AL, Haeffner MP, et al. Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2021;35:681-91.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898.
Ricksten SE, Bengtsson A, Soderberg C, et al. Effects of periodic positive airway pressure by mask on postoperative pulmonary function. Chest 1986;89:774-81.
Frølund L, Madsen F. Self-administered prophylactic postoperative positive expiratory pressure in thoracic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1986;30:381-5.
Westerdahl E, Lindmark B, Almgren SO, Tenling A. Chest physiotherapy after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a comparison of three different deep breathing techniques. J Rehabil Med 2001;33:79-84.
Westerdahl E, Lindmark B, Eriksson T, et al. Deep-breathing exercises reduce atelectasis and improve pulmonary function after coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2005;128:3482-8.
Rotolo N, Cattoni M, D’Andria M, et al. Comparison of an expiratory flow accelerator device versus positive expiratory pressure for tracheobronchial airway clearance after lung cancer lobectomy: a preliminary study. Physiotherapy 2021;110:34-41.
Fagevik Olsén M, Wennberg E, Johnsson E, et al. Randomized clinical study of the prevention of pulmonary complications after thoracoabdominal resection by two different breathing techniques. Br J Surg 2002;89:1228-34.
Ingwersen UM, Larsen KR, Bertelsen MT, et al. Three different mask physiotherapy regimens for prevention of post-operative pulmonary complications after heart and pulmonary surgery. Intensive Care Med 1993;19:294-8.
Richter Larsen K, Ingwersen U, Thode S, Jakobsen S. Mask physiotherapy in patients after heart surgery: a controlled study. Intensive Care Med 1995;21:469-74.
Fagevik Olsén M, Hahn I, Nordgren S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of prophylactic chest physiotherapy in major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 1997;84:1535-8.
Westerdahl E, Lindmark B, Eriksson T, et al. The immediate effects of deep breathing exercises on atelectasis and oxygenation after cardiac surgery. Scand Cardiovasc J 2003;37:363-7.
Matte P, Jacquet L, Van Dyck M, Goenen M. Effects of conventional physiotherapy, continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive ventilatory support with bilevel positive airway pressure after coronary artery bypass grafting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:75-81.
Ferreyra GP, Baussano I, Squadrone V, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of respiratory complications after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008;247:617-26.
Miskovic A, Lumb AB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth 2017;118:317-34.
Campbell I, Waterhouse J. Applied respiratory physiology. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 2005;6:371-5.
Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. Mechanisms of atelectasis in the perioperative period. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2010;24:157-69.
Magnusson L, Spahn DR. New concepts of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2003;91:61-72.
Lagier D, Zeng C, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Vidal Melo MF. Perioperative pulmonary atelectasis: part II. Clinical implications. Anesthesiology 2022;136:206-36.
Saraswat V. Effects of anaesthesia techniques and drugs on pulmonary function. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:557-64.
Jimenez-Santana JD, Azzolina D, Scaramuzzo G, et al. Ultrasound-detected postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction and its association with pulmonary complications. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2025;107:112027.
Saliba KA, Blackstock F, McCarren B, Tang CY. Effect of positive expiratory pressure therapy on lung volumes and health outcomes in adults with chest trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 2022;102:pzab254.
Santos MD, Milross MA, Eisenhuth JP, Alison JA. Pressures and oscillation frequencies generated by bubble-positive expiratory pressure devices. Respir Care 2017;62:444-50.
American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC clinical practice guideline: use of positive airway pressure adjuncts to bronchial hygiene therapy. Respir Care 1993;38:516-21.
How to Cite
“Efficacy of Positive Expiratory Pressure in the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. 2026. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, February. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2026.3735.
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.