Measuring change in rehabilitative cardiology: reliability of a short questionnaire to assess an outcome

https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2012.130

Authors

  • Ornella Bettinardi | o.bettinardi@ausl.pc.it Unità Operativa Emergenza-Urgenza, Dipartimento Salute Mentale e Dipendenze Patologiche, AUSL Piacenza, Italy.
  • Giulio Vidotto Università di Padova, Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Italy.
  • Loretta Moroni Servizio di Psicologia, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri Clinica del Lavoro e della Riabilitazione IRCCS, Istituto di Tradate, (VA), Italy.
  • Roberto F.E. Pedretti Dipartimento di Medicina e Riabilitazione Cardiorespiratoria, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri Clinica del Lavoro e della Riabilitazione IRCCS, Istituto di Tradate, (VA), Italy.
  • Maurizio Maini Direzione Sanitaria, San Giacomo Ospedale Privato Accreditato UU.FF. Omnicomprensive di Medicina Riabilitativa, Ponte dell’Olio, Piacenza, Italy.
  • Alessandro Rosi UF di Riabilitazione Cardiologica San Giacomo Ospedale Privato Accreditato UU.FF. Omnicomprensive di Medicina Riabilitativa, Direzione Sanitaria, Ponte dell’Olio, Piacenza, Italy.
  • Giorgio Bertolotti Servizio di Psicologia, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri Clinica del Lavoro e della Riabilitazione IRCCS, Istituto di Tradate (VA), Italy.

Abstract

The present Italian health planning demands the use of tools, care and treatments useful for the National Health Service, but with empirical effectiveness scientifically sustained. Aim of the present paper is to verify the validity, the reliability and the responsiveness of the factor “Perception of positive change†(named Schedule C) in cardiovascular rehabilitation. Method. The reliability of the Schedule C of the CBA VE has been examined comparing the mean scores obtained from each item at the entry and just before the discharge through the t-Student for paired sample. To assess the concurrent validity we used the AD Short Scale to measure anxiety and depression. 100 patients who underwent cardiac surgery were enrolled during hospitalization for a Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess internal consistency of each item. Results. Each item of the Schedule C demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha >.88) and elevated correlations item-total for each item. The strong correlation of anxiety and depression scores with the Schedule C points out appropriate concurrent validation. Conclusions. We believe that the Schedule C of the CBA VE is endowed with suitable metric validity and then useful as outcome evaluation in cardiovascular rehabilitation settings.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published
2015-12-01
Info
Issue
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
outcome, questionnaire, CBA VE
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 541

  • PDF: 454
How to Cite
Bettinardi, Ornella, Giulio Vidotto, Loretta Moroni, Roberto F.E. Pedretti, Maurizio Maini, Alessandro Rosi, and Giorgio Bertolotti. 2015. “Measuring Change in Rehabilitative Cardiology: Reliability of a Short Questionnaire to Assess an Outcome”. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease 78 (2). https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2012.130.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.