Pneumology - Original Articles

Utility of pleural fluid biomarkers in differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusion: a cross-sectional study

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 18 September 2025
Published: 6 August 2026
27
Views
18
Downloads

Authors

As cytopathological examination of the pleural fluid (PF) has a low yield, it is difficult to differentiate benign from malignant pleural effusions (PEs). There is still a lack of biomarkers in PF that can reliably help in diagnosing malignant PEs. Diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing malignant PEs is enhanced by the presence of tumor markers in PE. This would raise the likelihood of diagnosing malignant PEs with an unclear cause and starting treatment interventions early to lower morbidity and death rates in the patient. Thus, in an effort to enhance the PE diagnosis, novel PF biomarkers such as cancer ratio, cancer ratio plus, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), and calprotectin were evaluated. A total of 108 patients with PEs were taken, and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 83 patients with exudative PE were evaluated. After clinical history and routine blood investigations, PF was sent for cytopathology, biochemical examinations, microbiological examinations for aerobic culture, fungal culture, mycobacterial culture, and biomarker (CEA, CA-125, calprotectin) analyses. Out of 83 patients with exudative PE, malignant effusion was diagnosed in 40 patients, while 43 had benign effusions. PF biomarkers adenosine deaminase (ADA), CEA, cancer ratio, calprotectin, age/ADA and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/calprotectin ratio showed a statistically significant (p<0.0001) difference between benign and malignant PE. PF CEA showed the highest specificity (97.67%) at the cut-off point of 1.96 ng/mL and age/ADA ratio showed the highest sensitivity (97.5%) at the cut-off point of 1.56 for prediction of malignancy. Cancer ratio, PL calprotectin and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio also showed good sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of malignancy. PF CA-125 showed poor sensitivity (50%) and cancer ratio plus did not reveal any statistically significant difference for prediction of malignancy from benign effusion (p=0.486). PF biomarkers (cancer ratio, CEA, age/ADA ratio, calprotectin, and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio) are reliable indicators of malignancy in exudative pleural effusions. Patients with exudative lymphocytic with unexplained pleural effusion can be addressed early using inexpensive and generally available biochemical indicators, such as pleural fluid CEA, calprotectin, cancer ratio, and serum LDH/calprotectin ratio.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Light RW. Pleural diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

Verma A, Dagaonkar RS, Marshall D, et al. Differentiating malignant from tubercular pleural effusion by cancer ratio plus (cancer ratio: pleural lymphocyte count). Can Respir J 2016;2016:7348239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7348239

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Non-small cell lung cancer (Version 6.2020). Available from: https://guidelines.nccn.org/guidelines/nsclc.

Mehta AA, Gupta AS, Ahmed S, Rajesh V. Diagnostic utility of adenosine deaminase in exudative pleural effusions. Lung India 2014;31:142-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.129842

Villena Garrido V, Ferrer Sancho J, Hernández Blasco L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pleural effusion. Arch Bronconeumol 2006;42:349-72. [Article in Spanish]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1579-2129(06)60545-4

American Thoracic Society. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1987-2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.ats8-00

Solooki M. Diagnostic yield of cytology in malignant pleural effusion: impact of volume and repeated thoracentesis. Eur Respir J 2011;38:3550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003/erj.38.Suppl_55.p3550

Antonangelo L, Sales RK, Corá AP, et al. Pleural fluid tumour markers in malignant pleural effusion with inconclusive cytologic results. Curr Oncol 2015;22:336-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2563

Mohammed OM, Hussein KM, Ramadan AE, et al. Diagnostic value of calprotectin in differentiation between benign and malignant pleural effusion. Egypt J Bronchol 2019;13:382-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ejb.ejb_77_18

Korczyński P, Mierzejewski M, Krenke R, et al. Cancer ratio and other new parameters for differentiation between malignant and nonmalignant pleural effusions. Pol Arch Intern Med 2018;128:354-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.4278

Lara S, Fabrellas E, Samper G, et al. Predicting malignant and paramalignant pleural effusions by combining clinical, radiological and pleural fluid analytical parameters. Lung 2017;195:653-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-017-0032-3

Gulyas M, Wiman KG, Strömvall K, et al. Use of cholesterol and soluble tumour markers CEA and syndecan-2 in pleural effusions in cases of inconclusive cytology. J Clin Pathol 2019;72:529-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205650

Kushwaha R, Shashikala P, Hiremath S, Basavaraj HG. Cells in pleural fluid and their value in differential diagnosis. J Cytol 2008;25:138-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.50799

Burgess LJ, Maritz FJ, Le Roux I, Taljaard JF. Combined use of pleural adenosine deaminase with lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio: increased specificity for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. Chest 1996;109:414-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.109.2.414

Castro DJ, Nuevo GD, Perez-Rodriguez E, Light RW. Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 2003;21:220-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00051603

Sanchez-Otero N, Blanco-Prieto S, Paez de la Cadena M, et al. Calprotectin: a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of pleural effusion. Br J Cancer 2012;107:1876-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.478

Botana-Rial M, Vázquez-Iglesias L, Casado-Rey P, et al. Validation of calprotectin as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of pleural effusion: a multicentre trial. Sci Rep 2020;10:5679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62388-y

Luo J, Wang M, Li C, et al. A novel combination of calprotectin and CXCL12 for predicting malignancy in patients with exudative pleural effusion. Medicine 2015;94:e2105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002105

Ethics Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan (AIIMS/IEC/2022/3941).

How to Cite



“Utility of Pleural Fluid Biomarkers in Differentiating Malignant and Benign Pleural Effusion: A Cross-Sectional Study”. 2026. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, August. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2026.3731.