Pneumology - Original Articles
17 September 2025

The impact of pharmacist engagement on satisfaction with inhalers among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective interventional study

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
118
Views
63
Downloads

Authors

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), predicted to become the third leading cause of death by 2030 with 3 million annual fatalities, imposes significant health and economic burdens due to its diverse respiratory conditions. Effective management strategies include symptom relief, disease progression control, and exacerbation prevention through interventions like smoking cessation, medication, rehabilitation, and vaccination, with inhalation therapy (pressurized metered-dose inhalers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulizers) playing a pivotal role, yet challenges in proper inhaler use persist, impacting disease control and healthcare utilization, necessitating improved patient education, inhaler designs, and healthcare system support. The objective of this study was to examine the inhaler proficiency of COPD patients and evaluate their health status, along with their satisfaction regarding inhaler usage. COPD patients were enrolled, with their demographics recorded before evaluating inhaler skills through teach-back; health status was assessed using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and satisfaction with inhaler use with the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhalers Questionnaire (FSI-10), followed by pharmacist-led education and leaflet distribution, with 6-week and 3-month follow-ups for monitoring and support. Pharmacist involvement significantly improved COPD patients' satisfaction with inhalers, shifting from 91.81% to 36.36% reporting high satisfaction and from 8.18% to 63.63% reporting low satisfaction (p<0.001). Additionally, pharmacist intervention reduced the proportion of patients with very high CAT scores (>30) from 6.36% to 4.54% and high CAT scores (>20) from 48.18% to 24.54%, while increasing those with medium CAT scores (10-20) from 28.18% to 54.54% (p<0.001). Our study highlights that educating patients on proper inhaler techniques significantly improves COPD management, reducing exacerbations and hospital readmissions. Despite improvements in symptoms and quality of life (decreased CAT scores), patient satisfaction (FSI-10 scores) increased, suggesting effective intervention outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of enhancing patient education and adherence strategies, especially for those previously unaware of inhaler techniques. This emphasizes the need for comprehensive COPD management strategies addressing symptom relief and patient well-being.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Mirza S, Clay RD, Koslow MA, Scanlon PD. COPD guidelines: a review of the 2018 GOLD report. Mayo Clin Proc 2018;93:1488-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.05.026
WHO. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-(copd)
Cazzola M, D'Amato M, Califano C, et al. Formoterol as dry powder oral inhalation compared with salbutamol metered-dose inhaler in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Ther 2002;24:595-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(02)85135-9
Melani AS, Bonavia M, Cilenti V, et al. Inhaler mishandling remains common in real life and is associated with reduced disease control. Respir Med 2011;105:930-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2011.01.005
Tordera MP, Viejo JL, Sanchos J, et al. Assessment of patient satisfaction and preferences with inhalers in asthma with the FSI-10 questionnaire. Arch Bronconeumol 2008;44:346-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1579-2129(08)60060-9
García-Sidro P, Naval E, Rivera CM, et al. The CAT (copd assessment test) questionnaire as a predictor of the evolution of severe COPD exacerbations. Respir Med 2015;109:1546-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2015.10.011
Miravitlles M, Koblizek V, Esquinas C, et al. Determinants of CAT (COPD Assessment Test) scores in a population of patients with COPD in central and Eastern Europe: the POPE study. Respir Med 2019;150:141-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2019.03.007
Jang JG, Kim JS, Chung JH, et al. Comprehensive effects of organized education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2019;14:2603-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S221673
Arora P, Kumar L, Vohra V, et al. Evaluating the technique of using inhalation device in COPD and bronchial asthma patients. Respir Med 2014;108:992-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2014.04.021
Plaza V, Giner J, Curto E, et al. Determinants and differences in satisfaction with the inhaler among patients with asthma or COPD. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:645-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.020
Jang JG, Lee KH, Chung JH, et al. Assessment of inhaler satisfaction and determinants of high satisfaction among Korean COPD patients. J Korean Med Sci 2022;37:e327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e327
Ahn JH, Chung JH, Shin KC, et al. The effects of repeated inhaler device handling education in COPD patients: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep 2020;10:19676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76961-y
Shahid S. The effect of pharmacist involvement upon the satisfaction with inhalers (FSI-10) among asthma patients. J Young Pharmacists 2024;16:115-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2024.16.15

Ethics approval

The research was approved by the institutional ethics committee (Ref No; KLECOPBGMEC/D014-2023).

How to Cite



“The Impact of Pharmacist Engagement on Satisfaction With Inhalers Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Interventional Study”. 2025. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, September. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3439.