Pneumology - Original Articles
3 September 2025

A study to assess the utility of forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds in diagnosing obstructive airway disease

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
34
Views
39
Downloads

Authors

According to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria, the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) is required to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, it becomes difficult for all patients to meet the proper criteria. Hence, replacing FVC with forced expiratory volume after 6 seconds (FEV6) can help patients get results early with fewer complications. This study was done to assess whether the FEV1/FVC can be replaced with FEV1/FEV6. A year-long observational cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2022 to January 2023. A total of 227 patients were enrolled from the respiratory medicine department. Demographic details and data from spirometry were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created using the data analysis results. The diagnostic utility of FEV1/FVC and FEV1/FEV6 in the diagnosis of obstructive airway disease was examined. Results obtained in the study showed the average FEV6 was 2.05 with a 0.71 standard deviation. An r² value of 0.967 (p<0.05) indicated a substantial association between the FEV1/FEV6 and FEV1/FVC ratios. An ROC curve was used to show that FEV1/FEV6 could diagnose FEV1/FVC<70%; the area under the curve was 0.987 (95% confidence interval: 0.971-1.000). It has been found that 0.705 is the ideal cut-off value, resulting in 100% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity. To conclude the study, there was a substantial association between FEV1/FVC and FEV1/FEV6 in the diagnosis of obstructive airway illness. Using FEV1/FEV6, an ROC curve was created, and an ideal cut-off of 0.705 was shown to detect obstructive airway disease. Numerous lives can be saved, and prognoses can be improved by using the FEV1/FEV6 study to identify obstructive airway illnesses more easily, improve compliance, and manage them early.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 3 (EPR-3): guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma-summary report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007;120:S94-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.029
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. 2024 GOLD report. Available from: https://goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report/.
Verma A, Gudi N, Yadav UN, et al. Prevalence of COPD among the population above 30 years in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health 2021;11:04038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04038
WHO. Global health estimates: life expectancy and leading causes of death and disability. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates.
Vogelmeier CF, Román-Rodríguez M, Singh D, et al. Goals of COPD treatment: focus on symptoms and exacerbations. Respir Med 2020;166:105938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105938
Akpinar-Elci M, Fedan KB, Enright PL. FEV6 as a surrogate for FVC in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in the workplace. Eur Respir J 2006;27:374-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.06.00081305
Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005;26:319-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00034805
Vandevoorde J, Verbanck S, Schuermans D, et al. FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 as an alternative for FEV1/FVC and FVC in the spirometric detection of airway obstruction and restriction. Chest 2005;127:1560-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.5.1560
Singh AK, Lohia A. FEV1/FEV6: a reliable, easy-to-use, and cheaper alternative to FEV1/FVC in diagnosing airway obstruction in Indian population. Int Sch Res Notices 2012;2012:109295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/109295
Agrawal S, Pearce N, Ebrahim S. Prevalence and risk factors for self-reported asthma in an adult Indian population: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2013;17:275-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.12.0438
Rosa FW, Perez-Padilla R, Camelier A, et al. Efficacy of the FEV1/FEV6 ratio compared to the FEV1/FVC ratio for the diagnosis of airway obstruction in subjects aged 40 years or over. Braz J Med Biol Res 2007;40:1615-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2006005000182
Aghili R, Kia M, Meysamie A, et al. Fixed cut-off for FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 in detection of obstructive and restrictive patterns. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2013;15:152-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.8163
Venkatachalam P, Dwivedi DP, Govindraj V. FEV1/FEV6 is effective as a surrogate for FEV1/FVC in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Indian J Tuberc 2021;68:230-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.09.002

Ethics approval

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun vide no SRHU/Reg/Int/2023-287(22).

How to Cite



“A Study to Assess the Utility of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Forced Expiratory Volume in 6 Seconds in Diagnosing Obstructive Airway Disease”. 2025. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, September. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3280.