Echocardiographic evaluation of paravalvular aortic regurgitation of a patient with recurrent aortic valve replacements

Submitted: January 11, 2021
Accepted: April 12, 2021
Published: April 21, 2021
Abstract Views: 2593
PDF: 373
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is a serious complication after surgical valve replacement. Echocardiography is the gold standard technique to assess the severity of PVR with an integrated approach. A 48-year-old male underwent aortic valve replacement due to infective endocarditis (IE). During in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation after a redo surgery for a new IE three years later, an echo-free anterior space around the valve with several PVRs through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was identified. On transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) a double PVR (anterior and posterior) with abscessual cavity was detected. The patient’s conditions worsened within six months with hemodynamic instability: a massive PVR due to a large abscess cavity next to the right cusp was confirmed by TTE and TOE and a third surgery was carried out. On the third admission at our Rehabilitation Unit the echo features were normal. Patient did not report any cardiovascular symptoms at 1 year follow-up.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Safi AM, Kwan T. Paravalvular regurgitation: a rare complication following valve replacement surgery. Angiology 2000;51:479-87. DOI:
Zoghbi WA, Asch FM, Bruce C, et al. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Valvular Regurgitation After Percutaneous Valve Repair or Replacement A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Erratum in: [No authors listed] J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32:914-7. J Am Soc Echocardiog 2019;32:431-75. DOI:
Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis - The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2015;36:3075-23. DOI:
Summers MR, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al. Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After TAVR and SAVR - Insights From the PARTNER Trials. Circulation 2019;140:1984–94. DOI:
Ruiz CR, Hahn RT, Alain Berrebi A, et al. Clinical trial principles and endpoint definitions for paravalvular leaks in surgical prosthesis. An expert statement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:2067-87. DOI:
Kytӧ V, Ahtela E, J Sipilӓ J, et al. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with infective endocarditis. Interact Cardiovasc Thoracic Surg 2019;29:386-92. DOI:
Pinheiro CP, Rezek D, Costa EP, et al. Paravalvular regurgitation: Clinical outcomes in surgical and percutaneous treatments. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;107:55-62. DOI:
Del Val Martìn D, Zamorano Gòmez JL. The role of imaging in paravalvular leak assessment. In: G Smolka, W Wojakowski, M Tendera, Editors. Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure. Springer, Singapore; 2017. p. 13-42. DOI:
Geleijnse ML, Di Martino LFM, Vletter WB, et al. Limitations and difficulties of echocardiographic short-axis assessment of paravalvular leakage after corevalve transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2016;14:37. DOI:
Hryniewiecki T, Zatorska K, Abramczuk E, et al. The usefulness of cardiac CT in the diagnosis of perivalvular complications in patients with infective endocarditis. Eur Radiology 2019;29:4368–76. DOI:
Eleid MF, Cabalka AK, Malouf JF, et al. Techniques and outcomes for the treatment of paravalvular leak. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e001945. DOI:
Salaun E, Jacquier A, Theron A, et al. Value of CMR in quantification of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:41-50.
Ghersin E, Martinez CA, Singh V, et al. ECG-Gated MDCT after aortic and mitral valve surgery. Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:W596-604. DOI:

How to Cite

Cannata, Lorenzo, and Camilla Zocco Ramazzo. 2021. “Echocardiographic Evaluation of Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation of a Patient With Recurrent Aortic Valve Replacements”. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease 91 (2).