Physiotherapist involvement in the pandemic era: a Lombardy region survey

Submitted: January 5, 2021
Accepted: April 17, 2021
Published: May 4, 2021
Abstract Views: 1462
PDF: 666
Supplementary: 90
Annex 1: 87
Annex 2: 98
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


In February 2020 the first COVID-19 case was reported in Italy and afterwards the virus started spreading rapidly, increasing dramatically the number of infected subjects. To face the pandemic outbreak, hospitals converted wards to assure COVID-19 patients’ care and adopted measures to reduce virus diffusion. The aim of this study was to determine how many physiotherapists, in the Lombardy region, worked during pandemic, whether they continued their usual practice or were employed in COVID-19 wards and in which tasks they were involved. The survey was submitted online by the national professional order. The response rate was 11.79%. During the pandemic, 648 (53.9%) respondents interrupted their services. Less than 20% of the physiotherapists that continued working were assigned to COVID-19 wards with the role of physiotherapist. Only a small proportion of respondents had advanced skills in respiratory physiotherapy. Moreover, this study showed a limited involvement of physiotherapists inside the very acute and intense settings. In conclusion, this work revealed that, during COVID-19 pandemic, in the Lombardy region a small percentage of physiotherapists was employed in COVID-19 wards, mainly in post-acute context. Even though the response rate of this survey was very low, this study highlights the need to define and underline the role of physiotherapy in acute setting during emergency.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Armocida B, Formenti B, Ussai S, et al. The Italian health system and the COVID-19 challenge. Lancet Public Health 2020;5:e253. DOI:
Lazzeri M, Lanza A, Bellini R, et al. Respiratory physiotherapy in patients with COVID-19 infection in acute setting: a Position Paper of the Italian Association of Respiratory Physiotherapists (ARIR). Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2020;90:1285. DOI:
Vitacca M, Lazzeri M, Guffanti E, et al. Italian suggestions for pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients recovering from acute respiratory failure: results of a Delphi process. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2020;90:1444. DOI:
Belli S, Balbi B, Prince I, et al. Low physical functioning and impaired performance of activities of daily life in COVID-19 patients who survived hospitalisation. Eur Respir J 2020;56:2002096. DOI:
Associazione Italiana Fisioterapisti AIFI, Commissioni di Albo dei Fisioterapisti. [Aggiornamento sulla nota sulla rimodulazione degli interventi fisioterapici nell'emergenza COVID19].[Report in Italian]. Available from:
Associazione Italiana Fisioterapisti AIFI, Commissioni di Albo dei Fisioterapisti. [Nota su DPCM 26 April 2020].[Report in Italian]. Available from:
Associazione Italiana Fisioterapisti AIFI, Commissioni di Albo dei Fisioterapisti. [Note sulla rimodulazione degli interventi fisioterapici in relazione all'emergenza COVID19].[Report in Italian]. Available from:
World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (‎‎‎SARI)‎‎‎ when COVID-19 disease is suspected: interim guidance, 13 March 2020. Available from: DOI:
Associazione Italiana Fisioterapisti AIFI, Commissioni di Albo dei Fisioterapisti. [Emergenza sanitaria COVID 19. Suggerimenti operativi per i fisioterapisti].[Report in Italian]. Available from:
Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e34. DOI:
Taherdoost H. Determining sample size; How to calculate survey sample size. Int J Econ Manage Syst 2017;2. Available from:
Baruch Y. Response rate in academic studies-A comparative analysis. Hum Relat 1999;52:421. DOI:
Gosselink RA, Wagenaar RC, Rijswijk H, et al. Diaphragmatic breathing reduces efficiency of breathing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;15:1136-42. DOI:
Fink JB. Positioning versus postural drainage. Respir Care 2002;47:769-77.
Lannefors L, Wollmer P. Mucus clearance with three chest physiotherapy regimes in cystic fibrosis: a comparison between postural drainage, PEP and physical exercise. Eur Respir J 1992;5:748-53.
Vitacca M, Clini E, Bianchi L, Ambrosino N. Acute effects of deep diaphragmatic breathing in COPD patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency. Eur Respir J 1998;11:408-15. DOI:

Supporting Agencies

Lombardy region section of the National Professional Order

How to Cite

Privitera, Emilia, Francesco D’Abrosca, Giuseppe Gaudiello, Marta Lazzeri, Angela Bellofiore, Pamela Frigerio, and Martina Santambrogio. 2021. “Physiotherapist Involvement in the Pandemic Era: A Lombardy Region Survey”. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease 91 (3).