Clinical and therapeutic value of carotid intima-media thickness

Submitted: December 9, 2015
Accepted: December 9, 2015
Published: December 9, 2015
Abstract Views: 990
PDF: 631
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) has been widely used to predict cardiovascular events in primary and secondary prevention studies. Yet, the power of IMT to reclassify risk level on top of conventional risk assessment based on classical risk factors remains unsettled. In fact, recent data indicate that the prognostic power of IMT is lower than that provided by the identification of carotid plaques. The role of IMT as surrogate endpoint to assess the efficacy of cardiovascular protective therapies is also still debated. In fact, no studies have ever been designed and powered to show a relationship between changes in carotid IMT during follow-up and cardiovascular events. Recently, two metaanalysis of trials using IMT as surrogate endpoint failed to demonstrate an association between IMT regression and cardiovascular events. The reasons for the lack of predictive role for changes in IMT are uncertain. It has been shown that IMT is not a pure atherosclerotic index, being substantially affected by age and hemodynamic factors including blood pressure and vessel wall shear stress. In addition, the status of carotid vessels does not strictly reflect that of coronary arteries. Finally, intra and inter-observer variability of measurements may further limit the association between IMT changes in individual patients and cardiovascular risk. Thus, IMT represents a valuable risk marker in population studies but its role for tailoring cardiovascular therapy in clinical practice remains currently uncertain.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


How to Cite

Vassallo, Enrico, Francesca Musella, Susanna Mosca, Laura Casaretti, Roberto Formisano, Giacomo Mattiello, Ada Bologna, Irma Fabiani, Francesco Gambardella, Laura Petraglia, Giuseppe Rengo, Dario Leosco, and Pasquale Perrone-Filardi. 2015. “Clinical and Therapeutic Value of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness”. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease 76 (3).