https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/issue/feed Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease 2020-09-23T03:17:41+00:00 Nadia Moscato nadia.moscato@pagepress.org Open Journal Systems <p><strong>Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease</strong> is an international scientific journal of the <em>Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri</em>, Pavia, Italy, dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in all fields of cardiopulmonary medicine and rehabilitation. <!--It is published in two series: the “Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention Series” (volume, even numbers) which, since 2002, is the official journal of the Italian Association for Cardiovascular Prevention, Rehabilitation and Epidemiology (GICR-IACPR); and the “Pulmonary Medicine and Rehabilitation Series” (volume, odd numbers).--></p> <p><strong>Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease</strong> publishes original articles, new methodological approaches, reviews, opinions, editorials, position papers on all aspects of cardiac and pulmonary medicine and rehabilitation, and, in addition, provides a forum for the inter-exchange of information, experiences and views on all issues of the cardiology profession, including education. Accordingly, original contributions on nursing, exercise treatment, health psychology, occupational medicine, care of the elderly, health economics and other fields related to the treatment, management, rehabilitation and prevention of cardiac and respiratory disease are welcome.</p> <p><strong>Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease</strong> promotes excellence in the profession of cardiology and pneumology through its commitment to the publication of research, support to continuous education, and encouragement and dissemination of ‘best practice’.</p> <p>This journal does not apply charge for publication to Authors as it is supported by institutional funds.</p> https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/1424 Hospital treatment of severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in COVID-19 situation: back to basics 2020-09-23T03:16:47+00:00 Pratap Upadhya drpratapu@gmail.com Rohit Vadala V_rohit@yahoo.co.in Arpitha A drarpithagynonco@gmail.com <p>Patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during COVID-19 pandemic have higher morbidity. Treatment of these patients require aerosolization procedures like nebulization and noninvasive modalities for ventilation like non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Role of these procedures in corona virus transmission when treating a case of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease should be further studied.</p> 2020-09-22T12:50:19+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 The Author(s) https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/1528 Telemedicine during COVID-19: a survey of Health Care Professionals’ perceptions 2020-09-23T03:17:14+00:00 Abdula Elawady abdullah.elawady@gmail.com Ahmed Khalil abdullah.elawady@gmail.com Omar Assaf abdula.elawady@nhs.net Samirah Toure abdullah.elawady@gmail.com Christopher Cassidy abdullah.elawady@gmail.com <p>The National Health Service (NHS) has rapidly adopted telemedicine solutions as an alternative to face-to-face consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of HCPs (Healthcare Professionals) were unfamiliar with Telemedicine prior to the current pandemic. Remote consultation is expected to continue for the foreseeable future, thus we designed this survey. A survey designed to evaluate the use of telephone consultation by HCPs, assessing its implementation, challenges and drawbacks. A web link survey conducted through SurveyMonkey was sent to HCPs across six UK Trusts the period of May 2020. The survey received 114 responses (84%) being doctors. 95% of respondents had not received training prior to engaging in telemedicine consultations. 64% were unaware of the updated General Medical Council guidance concerning remote consultations. The most common barrier in remote consultation was the inability to access patient records raised by 37% of respondents. However, 73% of respondents felt that patients understood their medical condition and the instructions given to them over the phone, and 70% agreed that videoconference consultations would add to patients care. Telemedicine can be used for selected groups of patients in the post COVID-19 era, and the HCPs carrying that should have the sufficient experience and knowledge expected to operate these clinics.</p> 2020-09-22T08:47:49+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 The Author(s) https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/1484 Of onions and men: Report of cavitary community acquired pneumonia due to <em>Burkholderia cepacia</em> complex in an immunocompetent patient and review of the literature 2020-09-23T03:17:41+00:00 Ravi Manglani ravipapu.manglani@wmchealth.org Ester Sherman ester.sherman@wmchealth.org Anna Shengelia anna.shengelia@wmchealth.org Oleg Epelbaum oleg.epelbaum@wmchealth.org <p><em>Burkholderia cepacia</em> complex consists of highly antibiotic resistant gram negative bacilli that are plant symbionts and also potential agents of human infection.&nbsp; This bacterial family’s claim to fame in clinical medicine is as the scourge of cystic fibrosis patients, in whom it is a notorious respiratory pathogen.&nbsp; Outside of cystic fibrosis, it rarely comes to mind as an etiology of community acquired pneumonia with or without lung cavitation in immunocompetent hosts.&nbsp; We describe a case of an otherwise healthy, community-dwelling man who presented with subacute cavitary lung disease, the causative organism of which turned out to be Burkholderia cepacia complex.&nbsp; Our report is accompanied by a review of the literature, which identified an additional eleven cases in the same category.&nbsp; We analyze all of the available cases for the emergence of any identifiable patterns or peculiarities.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> 2020-09-22T07:12:22+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 The Author(s) https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/1461 SeXX and COVID-19: tussle between the two 2020-09-19T03:14:39+00:00 Ashlesh Patil dr.ashlesh.p@gmail.com Jaya Prasad Tripathy ijay.doc@gmail.com Vishwajit Deshmukh drvishwajitdeshmukh@gmail.com Bharat Sontakke drbharatsontakke@gmail.com Satyendra C. Tripathi sctripathi@aiimsnagpur.edu.in <p>Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has affected nearly 7 million individuals and claimed more than 0.4 million lives to date. There are several reports of gender differences related to infection and death due to COVID-19. This raises important questions such as “Whether there are differences based on gender in risk and severity of infection or mortality rate?” and “What are the biological explanation and mechanisms underlying these differences?” Emerging evidences have proposed sex-based immunological, genetic, and hormonal differences to explain this ambiguity. Besides biological differences, women have also faced social inequities and economic hardships due to this pandemic. Several recent studies have shown that independent of age males are at higher risk for severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Although susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 was found to be similar across both genders in several disease cohorts, a disproportionate death ratio in men can be partly explained by the higher burden of pre-existing diseases and occupational exposures among men. At immunological point of view, females can engage a more active immune response, which may protect them and counter infectious diseases as compared to men. This attribute of better immune responses towards pathogens is thought to be due to high estrogen levels in females. Here we review the current knowledge about sex differences in susceptibility, the severity of infection and mortality, host immune responses, and the role of sex hormones in COVID-19 disease.</p> 2020-09-18T12:09:47+00:00 Copyright (c) 2020 The Author(s)